MGM contended in the complaint that the respondent,registered and used the disputed domain names in bad faith and managed to demonstrate that :
"Respondent’s disputed domain names resolve to a website containing links to third-party websites, some of which compete with Complainant. It is clear that this activity disrupts Complainant’s business, as Internet users desiring Complainant’s products will be directed to sites featuring competing products as well as Complainant’s services. "
"The Panel has previously concluded that Respondent is engaged in the practice of typosquatting through the use of the confusingly similar disputed domain name."
The Panel ordered the disputed domain names to be transferred from the respondent to the complainant.
You can read the decision here .



