"Respondent’s registration and use of the domain name was done in bad faith. The disputed domain name has been found confusingly similar to Complainant’s GOOGLE mark. As a result, many Internet users seeking Complainant’s website will instead find themselves at Respondent’s website. Internet users may become confused as whether Complainant sponsors Respondent’s website at . "
The respondent failed to submit a response in this proceeding.
The Panel ordered the disputed domain name be transferred from the respondent to the complainant.
You can read the decision here .



