The GAC Communiqué that came out as a result of the meeting notes "that the GAC will provide the Board at the earliest opportunity with a list or "scorecard" of the issues which the GAC feels are still outstanding and require additional discussion between the Board and the GAC. These include:
- The objection procedures including the requirements for governments to pay fees
- Procedures for the review of sensitive strings
- Root Zone Scaling
- Market and Economic Impacts
- Registry - Registrar Separation
- Protection of Rights Owners and consumer protection issues
- Post-delegation disputes with governments
- Use and protection of geographical names
- Legal recourse for applicants
- Providing opportunities for all stakeholders including those from developing countries
- Law enforcement due diligence recommendations to amend the Registrar Accreditation Agreement as noted in the Brussels Communiqué
- The need for an early warning to applicants whether a proposed string would be considered controversial or to raise sensitivities (including geographical names).
Kieren McCarthy has also written on the issue on the Global Internet Business Coalition website at:
gibc.biz/2010/12/governments-outline-12-points-of-gtld-contention-with-icann/
The GAC communiqué is available at:
gac.icann.org/system/files/Cartagena_Communique_0.pdf



