The company owns many trademark registrations for the "iTunes" mark.Therefore,it is more than obvious that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to its trademark .Moreover,Apple contended that the respondent registered and used the disputed domains in bad faith .
"In this case, the Respondent has acquired and used domain names that are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark in order to redirect Internet traffic to a gambling website, apparently deriving an income thereby. The Respondent has therefore intentionally attempted to attract Internet users to its website, for commercial gain, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademark. "
The Panel ordered the disputed domain name to be transferred from the respondent to the complainant .
You can read the decision here .



